Franklin city
For Franklin city, see Virginia’s statewide laws and regulations below. No additional county-specific measures are listed in our research.
Mixed Data Center Policies
Virginia offers conditional tax breaks and optional local tax benefits for qualifying data centers, while requiring large new facilities to assess noise and certain generators to meet emission limits for applications from July 2026. Separate water reporting by covered suppliers is upcoming.
current law · StatewideChanges Virginia’s property-tax valuation rule for qualifying data-center fixtures by requiring fixtures taxed as real property to be assessed using the cost approach—reproduction or replacement cost less depreciation—rather than the income they generate (§ 58.1-3295.3).Virginia SB 513 (2022)
What this means
The measure requires data-center fixtures taxed as real property to be valued by their depreciated replacement cost, rather than by income they generate, which may modestly benefit operators and make assessments clearer (cost-based assessment). It does not guarantee lower taxes or add development and operating restrictions, so the benefit is limited.
People behind it
- Jeremy S. McPike
Introduced SB 513.
- Virginia General Assembly
Enacted the measure.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Data-center fixtures that are taxed under Virginia’s property-tax laws must be assessed using the cost approach, which values them based on reproduction or replacement cost minus physical, functional, and economic depreciation. This creates a property-tax assessment requirement for covered fixtures, including power, cooling, HVAC, water, monitoring, and transmission equipment; computer equipment and peripherals, external surveillance and security equipment, and fire and burglar alarm systems are excluded.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Data-center fixtures taxed under the chapter must be assessed using the cost approach—reproduction or replacement cost minus physical, functional, and economic depreciation—rather than an income-based valuation. This applies only to qualifying fixtures, excluding computer equipment and peripherals, external surveillance and security equipment, and fire and burglar alarm systems. Cost-based assessment requirement
Sources
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.vpap.org
- legiscan.com
- apps.senate.virginia.gov
- datacenterrecord.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- fastdemocracy.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.fairfaxcounty.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- apps.senate.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.tax.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.readkong.com
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- vedp.org
current law · StatewideVirginia's 2018 companion measures HB 828 and SB 268 establish a separate classification of tangible personal property for data-center computer equipment and peripherals.Virginia HB 828 (2018) / Virginia SB 268 (2018)
What this means
The measure gives data-center equipment a separate tax classification and valuation method, and localities may tax it at a lower rate, but they are not required to do so. It adds no building or operating restrictions, so the benefit is positive but limited. separate class of property
People behind it
- Lamont Bagby
Introduced HB 828, which proposed a separate personal-property tax classification for computer equipment and peripherals used in data centers.
- Siobhan S. Dunnavant
Introduced SB 268, the companion measure proposing a separate personal-property tax classification for computer equipment and peripherals used in data centers.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
The measure creates a separate local personal-property-tax classification for computer equipment and peripherals used in data centers and requires that equipment to be valued using a percentage of original cost or another method reasonably expected to determine fair market value. This can affect operating tax assessments; it does not itself set a tax rate or require a locality to levy the tax. Data-center equipment valuation
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions2
Computer equipment and peripherals used in a data center receive a separate valuation category. They may be valued using a percentage of original cost or another method reasonably expected to determine actual fair market value. The data-center equipment valuation rule
Localities may tax the separately classified data-center property at a different rate from other tangible personal property; the rate may not exceed the rate for the general tangible-personal-property class. Localities may levy different rates
Sources
current law · StatewideVirginia Code § 10.1-1322.6 is the statewide generator-emissions statute enacted by HB 507, approved April 8, 2026 as Chapter 397.Virginia Code § 10.1-1322.6 — Data centers; permit requirements and emission limits for engine-generator sets
What this means
New data center permit applications submitted on or after July 1, 2026, must meet Tier 4-equivalent emission limits for each generator, which may add equipment and operating costs. This is a meaningful requirement, but it does not ban data centers or apply to every aspect of their construction and operation.
People behind it
- John Chilton McAuliff
Chief patron of HB 507.
- State Air Pollution Control Board
Adopted final amendments implementing HB 507.
- Department of Environmental Quality
Administers the permit requirements under the measure.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
For data-center permit applications submitted on or after July 1, 2026, including applications for coverage under a general permit, each engine-generator set must have a permitted emission limit no higher than emissions achieved by a Tier 4 equivalent set. Tier 4 equivalent requires controls for nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter; the Department may set stricter limits. The permit requirement and effective date.
Sources
current law · StatewideHB 872 (2016), approved March 11, 2016, extends the qualifying data center sales/use-tax exemption from June 30, 2020, to June 30, 2035, preserves tenant job/investment aggregation, and allows qualifying jobs relocated to a new data center to count with a qualifying $500 million investment.Virginia HB 872 (2016)
What this means
The bill gives data centers a major tax benefit by extending the sales-tax exemption through 2035 and allowing certain existing jobs to count at a new center. The exemption still has investment, job, and agreement requirements, but the bill does not add new operating or construction restrictions (extends the exemption to 2035).
Timing
- Ends
- Jun 30, 2035
Historical enactment extends exemption to June 30, 2035; subsequent amendments are separate measures.
People behind it
- Timothy D. Hugo
Patron
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Tax incentive remains conditional on investment/jobs criteria and a memorandum of understanding; these are not siting restrictions.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Extends exemption to June 30, 2035, preserves tenant aggregation and permits qualifying job relocation.
Sources
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.vpap.org
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- law.lis.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideHB 507 (2026), approved April 8, 2026 as Chapter 397, adds statewide § 10.1-1322.6.Virginia HB 507 (2026)
What this means
For data-center air-permit applications submitted on or after July 1, 2026, each engine-generator set must meet emissions limits no higher than those achieved by a Tier 4-equivalent set (the permit requirement). This could add equipment costs or limit generator choices, but it does not prevent development and still allows permits with less stringent limits only if they meet the standard.
People behind it
- John Chilton McAuliff
Democratic
Chief patron and introducer of HB507. The bill page identifies him as Chief Patron.
- Department of Environmental Quality
Responsible for administering the measure’s data-center permitting requirements and implementing HB507 through a regulatory action. The action summary describes the new standards.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
For data-center permit applications submitted on or after July 1, 2026, DEQ may not issue a permit, including general-permit coverage, unless each engine-generator set’s permitted emissions are no greater than those achieved by a Tier 4-equivalent set. That standard requires controls (or equivalents) for nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, and particulate matter. The Department shall not issue such permit unless
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
The Tier 4-equivalent emissions requirement applies only to permit applications submitted on or after July 1, 2026. Earlier applications and permits are not subject to this new requirement.
Sources
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- townhall.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- www.vpap.org
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.virginia.gov
- townhall.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- house.vga.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- legiscan.com
- www.richmondsunlight.com
current law · StatewideRequires localities to obtain site assessments before approving rezoning, special-exception, or special-use-permit applications for new high energy use facilities (HEUFs) expected to require at least 100 megawatts of electricity.Virginia Code § 15.2-2209.5, Siting of data centers; site assessment
What this means
It would add a limited paperwork and study requirement before local approval of a new facility expected to use at least 100 megawatts, including a sound assessment near homes and schools (site assessment). That may add some cost or delay, but the rule does not directly limit ongoing operations, and smaller expansions are exempt.
People behind it
- Danica A. Roem
Chief patron and introducer of SB94.
- Ebbin
Patron associated with SB130, which was incorporated into SB94.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements4
Before approving a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility requiring 100 megawatts or more, the locality must require the applicant to submit a site assessment of the facility’s sound profile on residences and schools within 500 feet of the property boundary. The assessment must be completed as practicable within the applicable statutory timeline. The 100-megawatt threshold and required sound assessment
A locality may require the applicant’s site assessment to examine impacts on ground and surface water, agricultural resources, parks, registered historic sites, and forestland on the facility site or immediately contiguous land. The additional subjects a locality may require the assessment to examine
Before approval of a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility, the serving retail electric utility must submit a form, to the extent known and practicable and within the applicable statutory timeline, identifying the new or existing substations that will serve the facility and the anticipated transmission voltage. The utility information required before approval
The locality must use the submitted site assessments to evaluate consistency with its comprehensive plan and compliance with local noise ordinances, zoning provisions, and other applicable laws and regulations, creating an additional review requirement before approval. How the locality must use the site assessments
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
An existing or approved facility may expand or be modified without being subject to this section’s site-assessment requirements when the expansion does not exceed the stated additional 100-megawatt threshold. This exemption applies to expansions or modifications of already existing or approved facilities.
Sources
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- www.vpap.org
- www.vpap.org
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- legiscan.com
- dls.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideHB 323, approved April 13, 2026 as Chapter 591, directs the Department of Energy to lead efforts to accelerate the use of waste heat from data centers.Virginia HB 323 (2026)
What this means
The measure directs the Department of Energy to study ways to use data-center waste heat and report recommendations, but it does not require data centers to install equipment or change how they operate (identify opportunities for beneficial use of waste heat). It could support future beneficial uses, but by itself it creates no meaningful development benefit or burden.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
No direct operator restriction identified; Chapter 591 assigns duties to the Department of Energy.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Facilitates connections with potential public and private heat users and includes the data center industry in the work group.
Sources
current law · StatewideRequires localities to obtain site assessments before approving rezoning, special-exception, or special-use permit applications for new high energy use facilities (HEUFs)—facilities expected to require at least 100 megawatts from a retail-serving electric utility—under Va.Virginia SB 94 (2026)
What this means
The measure adds a site-assessment requirement for new facilities expected to use at least 100 megawatts, including a review of noise near homes and schools, plus information from the serving utility (site assessment requirements). That may add some study costs, but the assessment must fit the existing application timeline, and smaller expansions are exempt, so the overall burden appears limited.
People behind it
- Danica A. Roem
Chief patron and introducer of SB94.
- Ebbin
Patron associated with SB130, which SB94 incorporates.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements3
Before a locality may approve a rezoning application, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility requiring 100 megawatts or more, the applicant must submit a site assessment of the facility’s sound profile as it affects residential units and schools within 500 feet of the property boundary.
A locality may require the site assessment for a new high energy use facility to evaluate effects on ground and surface water, agricultural resources, parks, registered historic sites, and forestland on the site or immediately contiguous land.
Before approval of the required zoning application for a new high energy use facility, the serving electric utility must submit a form identifying the new or existing substations that will serve the facility and the anticipated transmission voltage, to the extent known and practicable.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions4
Facilities that are not reasonably anticipated to require at least 100 megawatts of electricity are not covered by the high energy use facility requirements in this section. The definition sets the threshold at 100 megawatts or more.
An already existing or approved facility may be expanded or modified without triggering this section’s site-assessment requirements when the expansion does not add 100 megawatts or more of electrical power. The exemption applies to expansions or modifications not exceeding the stated additional power limit.
Required site assessments must be performed only to the extent practicable and within the statutory review timeline, limiting the assessment burden and potential permitting delay. Assessments must be completed to the extent practicable and within the applicable timeline.
The mandatory sound-profile assessment is limited to residential units and schools located within 500 feet of the facility boundary; reviews of water, agricultural, park, historic-site, and forestland impacts are discretionary for the locality. The required sound review covers residences and schools within 500 feet.
Sources
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- legiscan.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- www.vpap.org
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- sfac.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- legiscan.com
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- legiscan.com
- legiscan.com
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
current law · StatewideStatewide law, not a Brunswick County ordinance.Virginia HB 2273 (2021 Special Session I) — Data Centers; Sales and Use Tax Exemption and Reporting
What this means
The measure makes the tax break easier to qualify for in distressed localities, lowering the job target from 25 to 10 and the investment threshold from $150 million to $70 million (reduced requirements). That is a meaningful incentive to build or expand, though it applies only to qualifying centers and operators must file annual reports (annual report requirement).
People behind it
- James W. Morefield
Introduced HB 2273. The bill was introduced by James W. Morefield.
- Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority
Administers the exemption’s reporting process: receives annual reports from data center operators and shares collected information with the Department of Taxation. Operators must submit an annual report to the Authority.
- Department of Taxation
Collaborates with the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority on the biennial exemption report and submits it to the specified legislative committee chairs. The Department shall submit the report.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements2
Operators claiming the exemption must submit an annual report covering employment, investment, wages, qualifying expenses, tax benefits and other requested information.
Taxation must publish a biennial report on the exemption. Reporting applies regardless of when operators located a new data center.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions3
Qualified data center operators and tenants can receive a sales and use tax exemption for eligible computer equipment and enabling software, including servers, routers, chillers, and backup generators. The exemption is available through June 30, 2035, subject to the investment, job, wage, and memorandum-of-understanding requirements. Eligible equipment and software
For a data center in a distressed locality, the job threshold is reduced to 10 new jobs and the required capital investment to $70 million; otherwise, the thresholds are 50 jobs and $150 million. Qualifying jobs must pay at least 1.5 times the locality’s prevailing average wage. A distressed locality is identified using unemployment and poverty rates relative to statewide rates. Reduced job and investment thresholds
The exemption also covers qualifying equipment or software bought or leased to upgrade, supplement, or replace items from the initial investment, supporting expansion and ongoing operation. It applies to the operator and tenants collectively when they meet the requirements. Upgrade, supplement, or replace
Sources
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- www.vpap.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- publications.virginiageneralassembly.gov
- www.tax.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideVerified as SB 1423 (2021 Special Session I), approved March 25, 2021, Chapter 368—not a dead bill.Virginia S1423 (2021)
What this means
The measure makes the sales-tax break easier to qualify for in distressed localities by lowering the job threshold to 10 and the investment threshold to $70 million (reduced requirements). It also adds annual reporting, but that is a modest burden compared with the financial incentive to build or expand qualifying data centers.
People behind it
- Jeremy S. McPike
Named as an introducer of SB 1423 (introduced by).
- Todd E. Pillion
Named as an introducer of SB 1423 (introduced by).
- Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority
Administers key requirements by entering into memoranda of understanding and receiving annual data-center reports (submit an annual report to the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority).
Show 1 more peopleShow fewer people
- Virginia Department of Taxation
Shares responsibility with the Authority for the biennial report on the exemption (The Department, in collaboration with the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority).
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Adds operator reporting: claimants must submit an annual report to the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority. Reports include employment, investments, wages, qualifying expenses and tax benefit. Existing investment, jobs, wage and agreement conditions remain eligibility conditions, not siting bans. Later statutory extensions to 2040/2050 are not attributed to this 2021 act.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions3
Qualifying Virginia data centers can receive a sales-and-use-tax exemption for computer equipment and enabling software used to process, store, retrieve, or communicate data, including servers, routers, chillers, and backup generators. The standard qualification requires at least $150 million in new capital investment and 50 new jobs paying at least 1.5 times the locality’s prevailing average wage; a memorandum of understanding with the Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority is required. The exemption is available through June 30, 2035.
For a data center in a qualifying distressed locality, the job threshold falls to 10 and the required capital investment to $70 million. A locality qualifies based on unemployment and poverty rates exceeding the corresponding statewide averages; the statute specifies the data years used for that test. The reduced thresholds apply when the center is in a distressed locality.
The exemption can cover the operator and its tenants if they meet the requirements collectively, as well as qualifying same-locality facilities under common ownership or affiliation. It also covers eligible equipment and software bought or leased to upgrade, supplement, or replace the initial investment; separately sold taxable software and general building improvements or fixtures are excluded. The exemption applies to the data center operator and the tenants.
Sources
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.vpap.org
- legiscan.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.blob.core.windows.net
- law.lis.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideVirginia HB 791 is a statewide data-center property-tax law, not a Falls Church ordinance.Virginia H791 (2022)
What this means
This modestly favors data centers by requiring certain fixtures to be assessed using depreciated replacement cost rather than the income they generate, which may lower or make property-tax assessments more predictable (cost approach). It adds no development or operating restrictions, but the tax benefit is limited to qualifying fixtures, so the overall effect is small.
People behind it
- Joseph P. McNamara
Introduced HB 791.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Data-center fixtures taxed as real property must be assessed using the cost approach: reproduction or replacement cost less physical, functional, and economic depreciation. This applies only to fixtures taxed under the real-property chapter; fixtures taxed this way are excluded from tangible personal property. The cost-approach requirement and its scope
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Data-center fixtures taxed under the real-property tax chapter must be valued using the cost approach: the cost to construct a reproduction or suitable replacement, minus physical, functional, and economic depreciation. This replaces valuation based on income generated by the fixtures, but does not guarantee a lower assessment. The rule excludes computer equipment and peripherals, external surveillance and security equipment, and fire and burglar alarm systems from the definition of fixtures. Fixtures shall be assessed using the cost approach.
Sources
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- www.vpap.org
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- rga.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- datacenterrecord.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideCreates a separate valuation category for computer equipment and peripherals used in a data center, while not making it a separate class for tax-rate purposes.Virginia S.B. 268 (2018) — Chapter 292; Va. Code §§ 58.1-3503 and 58.1-3506
What this means
The bill gives local assessors a data-center-specific way to value equipment, including using a method expected to reflect fair market value. That may modestly help operators, but it does not require lower taxes or provide a tax break, so the practical benefit is limited (data-center equipment valuation).
People behind it
- Siobhan S. Dunnavant
Introduced SB 268 in the Virginia Senate.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions2
Computer equipment and peripherals used in a data center receive a separate valuation classification. They may be valued using a percentage of original cost or another method reasonably expected to determine actual fair market value, rather than being subject to the general business-property valuation category. See subdivision A 17
Computer equipment and peripherals used in a data center are established as a separate class for local taxation. A county, city, or town may tax this class at a different rate from other tangible personal property, but the rate and assessment rate may not exceed those applicable to the general tangible-personal-property class; if property qualifies for multiple classifications, the lowest applicable tax rate applies. See the data-center classification and rate limits
Sources
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.vpap.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- house.vga.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideVirginia SB 64 (2016), approved April 6, 2016, extends the qualifying data center sales/use-tax exemption from June 30, 2020, to June 30, 2035.Virginia SB 64 (2016)
What this means
The measure extends a sales-tax exemption for qualifying data-center equipment through 2035, making building and expanding eligible centers less costly (extends the exemption to June 30, 2035). The benefit is substantial but conditional on investment and job targets, so it is not an unrestricted incentive (at least $150 million).
Timing
- Ends
- Jun 30, 2035
The 2016 enactment extends the exemption to June 30, 2035. This describes that enactment; later extensions or amendments are separate measures.
People behind it
- Frank M. Ruff, Jr.
Chief patron.
- Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority
Party to the required memorandum of understanding.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Retains eligibility requirements including at least $150 million investment, jobs/wages, and a memorandum of understanding with repayment obligations. These are retained incentive conditions, not new siting restrictions.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions2
Extends exemption from June 30, 2020, to June 30, 2035.
Eliminates the sunset date of June 30, 2020 on tenant aggregation and allows qualifying jobs relocated to a new data center in Virginia to count with a qualifying $500 million investment.
Sources
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- lis.virginia.gov
- vacode.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- www.tax.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- www.tax.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- www.richmondsunlight.com
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- datacenterrecord.org
- legacylis.virginia.gov
- law.lis.virginia.gov
- lis.virginia.gov
- legiscan.com
- tax.tl.virginia.gov
current law · StatewideRequires localities reviewing new high energy use facilities (HEUFs)—facilities expected to require at least 100 megawatts of electricity—to obtain a site assessment before approving rezoning, special exception, or special use permit applications.Virginia HB 153 (2026)
What this means
For new facilities expected to need at least 100 megawatts, the measure adds paperwork and assessment costs before certain zoning approvals, including a sound study near homes and schools within 500 feet. Localities may also request reviews of other site impacts, but smaller expansions are exempt and the measure does not replace existing zoning rules for expansions; overall, this is a minor added hurdle rather than a ban.
People behind it
- Joshua E. Thomas
Chief patron and introducer of HB153.
- McAuliff
Patron of HB511, which was incorporated into HB153.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements3
Before approving a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility requiring at least 100 megawatts of utility power, the locality must require the applicant to submit a site assessment examining the facility’s sound profile on residential units and schools within 500 feet of the property boundary, to the extent practicable and within the applicable statutory timeline. site assessment
A locality may require the site assessment for a new 100-megawatt-or-more facility to examine effects on ground and surface water, agricultural resources, parks, registered historic sites, and forestland on the site or immediately contiguous land, creating additional site-review requirements when imposed. effect of the proposed facility
Before approving a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility, the locality must require the serving electric utility to submit a form, to the extent known and practicable and within the applicable statutory timeline, identifying new or existing substations that will serve the facility and the anticipated transmission voltage. submit to the locality a form
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Expansions or modifications of an already existing or approved facility are exempt from the new site-assessment requirements when the additional electrical capacity does not exceed 100 megawatts, subject to the site having an existing legislative or administrative approval.
Sources
current law · StatewideTakes effect immediately to implement Virginia’s Data Center Accountability Framework and establish an Artificial Intelligence Task Force, aiming to protect communities, ratepayers, natural resources, energy affordability, grid reliability, and workforce interests.Virginia Executive Order 22 (2026)
What this means
This would make some projects harder to advance: new data centers expected to use at least 25 MW would lose access to certain state site-readiness and expedited-review programs (no assistance through these programs), and agencies would develop stronger noise and environmental rules. But the order does not ban data centers, and many actions call for reviews or recommendations rather than imposing immediate operating limits.
People behind it
- Abigail D. Spanberger
Governor who issued and signed Executive Order 22 and unveiled the Virginia Data Center Accountability Framework.
- Office of the Chief Energy Officer
Primary lead responsible for coordinating and implementing the statewide Data Center Accountability Framework.
- Virginia Economic Development Partnership
Directed to administer the exclusion of qualifying new data centers from state site-readiness, expedited-permitting, and similar discretionary programs.
Show 10 more peopleShow fewer people
- Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Directed to expedite data-center noise regulations, conduct a cumulative backup-generation impact review, and develop cooling-water-scarcity-area regulations.
- Virginia Energy
Directed to identify lower-impact development opportunities, evaluate grid-reliability practices, and support implementation of the framework.
- Secretary of Labor
Directed to develop best practices for quality jobs and local workforce opportunities.
- Virginia Works
Directed to develop criteria for project-level workforce data collection and reporting.
- Virginia Department of Forestry
Directed to develop local, sustainable, and responsible procurement practices for data-center development and operations.
- Chief Transformation Officer
Co-leader of the rapid-response AI Task Force and responsible for coordinating its actions.
- Counsel to the Governor
Co-leader of the rapid-response AI Task Force.
- Secretary of Administration
Co-leader of the rapid-response AI Task Force.
- AI Policy Planning Unit
Unit established within the Office of the Chief Transformation Officer to support the rapid-response AI Task Force.
- Rapid-response AI Task Force
Entity established to address AI-related risks through executive and legislative action, regulatory review, cybersecurity planning, and responsible-AI initiatives.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements17
Future data centers using more than 25 megawatts of power would require local approval and could no longer receive by-right approval; this requirement is proposed for legislation.
Effective immediately, VEDP may not provide assistance through the Virginia Business Ready Sites Program, expedited-permitting programs, or similar discretionary state programs to new data center projects with anticipated peak electrical demand of 25 megawatts or more.
Future large data centers would be removed from Virginia’s fast-track permitting process under the proposed framework.
Executive branch agencies and related state entities are prohibited from entering into, requiring, or enforcing nondisclosure agreements that conceal material information about proposed commercial data center developments, incentives, resource demands, or community impacts, subject to existing contractual commitments and extraordinary circumstances such as national security.
Data centers would be subject to new state standards for energy efficiency, water use, land impacts, and backup generation, with stronger agency enforcement for violations under the proposed framework.
The state would evaluate cumulative impacts from diesel and other backup generators and pursue permitting, monitoring, reporting, emissions-control, and disclosure requirements, including encouraging or requiring cleaner alternatives for existing and future facilities under the proposed framework.
DEQ must develop regulations designating cooling-water scarcity areas, and the Eastern Virginia Groundwater Management Area is designated as one; the resulting rules could restrict or condition water-intensive data center cooling operations.
Virginia would expedite data center noise regulations, subjecting facilities to additional noise-control requirements after the rulemaking process.
Data centers would be required to pay a more equitable share of transmission, generation, distribution, and other infrastructure costs attributable to their large loads, including applicable PJM Reliability Backstop Procurement and Interim Resource Adequacy Service costs.
Developers would face stronger upfront financial-commitment requirements to prevent speculative projects from tying up land, resources, and energy infrastructure.
Data centers that have not brought their own new capacity under PJM’s Interim Resource Adequacy Service program could be subject to emergency curtailment procedures once the program is approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Data centers would be required to meet operational standards intended to prevent sudden demand changes, voltage problems, or other actions that could destabilize the electric grid.
The proposed framework would limit the amount of electricity data centers may generate from onsite natural-gas or behind-the-meter gas facilities.
Data center projects would be subject to workforce and labor-related expectations, including local hiring, workforce-training goals, responsible-contractor standards, apprenticeship programs, and support for project labor agreements where possible.
Data center developers and operators would be expected to prioritize Virginia businesses and local, sustainable materials in procurement and contracting.
Virginia Works is directed to develop project-level workforce data-collection and reporting requirements covering job quality, workforce needs, training programs, and outcomes.
The VA-LEAD designation program would use tiered criteria covering energy and infrastructure impacts, water and land use, noise, workforce development, clean-energy investments, and community benefits; state incentives and administrative services would be aligned to prioritize developers meeting higher tiers.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions6
The VA-LEAD program will establish tiers for responsible data center development, and executive-branch agencies will align incentives and administrative services to prioritize developers achieving the highest tier. Eligibility will depend on factors such as energy and infrastructure impacts, water and land use, clean-energy investments, workforce development, and community benefits.
Virginia Energy will identify and publish opportunities for data center development in locations and configurations that reduce impacts, including brownfields, adaptive-reuse sites, previously developed land, areas with available infrastructure capacity, and smaller or distributed facilities. The review may also support co-location using data-center waste heat or reclaimed water.
The framework directs the Commonwealth to prioritize grid access for data centers that invest in clean energy, reduce backup-generator emissions, and limit on-site natural-gas generation. It also calls for making it easier for data centers to bring their own clean power, including by reforming utility charges that discourage such investment.
For data centers subject to emergency curtailment under PJM’s Interim Resource Adequacy Service, curtailment practices should reduce impacts on facilities that bring their own clean energy, make peak-shaving adjustments, or undertake other beneficial energy investments. This protection applies if the relevant proposal is approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Virginia Energy will evaluate and may recommend operational best practices, including ride-through and voltage protections, to improve grid reliability for data centers. The evaluation will be coordinated with PJM, NERC, utilities, and other stakeholders so that any state practices align with national standards.
The Office of the Chief Energy Officer will pursue strategies that direct data center investments into local energy projects intended to strengthen the grid and improve energy affordability. The strategies must focus on projects that provide meaningful household affordability benefits, expand access for low- and moderate-income families and historically disadvantaged communities, and include consumer protections.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis statewide law affects transmission projects associated with major electricity loads such as data centers.Virginia HB 1491 (2026)
What this means
This measure regulates where certain high-voltage transmission lines can be built, not data centers themselves, and it asks for routes to avoid or reduce impacts on homes and other nearby places (transmission-line siting requirements). Those limits could slightly complicate power infrastructure serving data centers, but the sources do not show a direct or major effect on building or operating them.
People behind it
- JJ Singh
Chief patron who introduced HB1491.
- Carroll
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
- McAuliff
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
Show 6 more peopleShow fewer people
- J.G. Cole
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
- N.T. Cole
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
- Guzman
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
- Reaser
Listed as a patron of HB1491.
- Roem
Listed as a Senate patron of HB1491.
- Srinivasan
Listed as a Senate patron of HB1491.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
For overhead transmission lines of 500 kilovolts or more constructed by Dominion Energy Virginia, the State Corporation Commission must prioritize approving corridors or routes whose center is more than 150 feet from any dwelling house, public or private school building, day care, or place of worship, unless no other practicable alternative exists. This can support construction of major electric-transmission infrastructure for electricity-intensive facilities, including data centers.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis statewide utility-cost measure applies to high-energy-use customers such as data centers seeking service in Winchester City.Virginia HB 1191 (2026)
What this means
The measure could modestly help large data centers arrange dedicated substations through electric cooperatives, but only for qualifying members with demand of at least 20 megawatts and a 230-kilovolt connection (eligibility requirements). The data center must pay the construction, operating, and maintenance costs, so this is a limited practical benefit rather than a broad incentive (member’s sole expense).
People behind it
- Irene Shin
Chief patron who introduced HB1191
- State Corporation Commission
Administers provisions involving petitions, dispute resolution, confidentiality, and fee-setting under the measure
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements7
A cooperative substation-construction agreement is available only for a member receiving regulated electric service whose demand was at least 20 megawatts during the most recent calendar year and whose project requires an interconnection with a transmission system of 230 kilovolts or more.
The member must construct the substation at its sole expense, for dedicated service only to its facilities, and in compliance with applicable laws, regulations, reliability standards, and the cooperative’s specifications.
After substantial completion, the member must provide written notice; the cooperative then has up to 60 days to inspect the substation and an additional 30 days after inspection to issue final construction change orders.
Upon final completion, the member must transfer ownership and control of the substation to the cooperative by donation or mutually agreed consideration.
After transfer, the cooperative will operate and maintain the substation at the member’s sole expense under the cooperative’s applicable rates, terms, and conditions.
The State Corporation Commission must exclude the substation’s acquisition, operation, and maintenance costs from the cooperative’s general and base rates, so those costs cannot be recovered from any ratepayer other than the member that entered the agreement.
If the cooperative does not negotiate or propose a draft agreement within 120 days after the member’s written request, the member may petition the Commission to order negotiations and a draft agreement; the member must pay the Commission’s fee for adjudicating the petition.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions8
An eligible large-load facility, including a data center that meets the thresholds, may arrange with an electric cooperative to construct a dedicated substation. Eligibility requires regulated electric service, at least 20 megawatts of demand during the most recent calendar year, and a required interconnection with a transmission system of 230 kilovolts or more. The facility must pay the substation's construction cost and comply with applicable laws, regulations, reliability standards, and the cooperative's specifications. may enter into an agreement to construct a substation
The substation-construction agreement must be filed with the State Corporation Commission for informational purposes, and the Commission must treat it as confidential if requested by the parties. filed jointly by the member and cooperative for informational purposes
The law establishes construction-completion deadlines: after the facility notifies the cooperative of substantial completion, the cooperative must inspect within 60 days and issue any final construction change orders within 30 days after the inspection. Within 60 days after receiving such notice
After final completion, the facility must transfer ownership and control of the substation to the cooperative by donation or mutually agreed consideration. The cooperative then operates and maintains it for the facility at the facility's sole expense under the cooperative's applicable rates, terms, and conditions. the member shall transfer ownership and control to the cooperative
The Commission must exclude the substation's acquisition, operation, and maintenance costs from the cooperative's general and base rates and prohibit recovery of those costs from ratepayers other than the facility that entered the agreement. no costs associated with such substation are recovered from any ratepayer other than the member
Agreements and acquisitions made under this section are exempt from the specified provisions of Virginia's electric-utility and public-service-company chapters, potentially reducing regulatory requirements for the substation arrangement. No provision of Chapter 5
The facility and cooperative must negotiate in good faith. If the cooperative does not negotiate or propose a draft agreement within 120 days after a written request, the facility may petition the Commission to order negotiations and a draft agreement; the Commission must hear the petition, if necessary, within three months and issue an order within six months. fails to negotiate or fails to propose a draft agreement within 120 days
The facility and cooperative may use the State Corporation Commission's informal and formal dispute-resolution processes for disputes arising during negotiations, construction, or transfer of the substation. recourse through the informal and formal dispute resolution processes
Sources
current law · StatewideThis statewide measure addresses electric-load forecasting relevant to rapidly growing data-center demand in Winchester City and Virginia.Virginia HB 892 (2026)
What this means
These measures do not directly require, restrict, or subsidize data centers. They change how utilities plan for energy storage and examine electricity demand forecasts, which could indirectly affect power planning but do not establish a meaningful data-center-specific burden or benefit (forecasting investigation; energy-storage planning).
People behind it
- Irene Shin
Chief patron who introduced HB892
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions5
Requires utilities’ integrated resource plans to assess energy-storage resources using modeling that accounts for economic charging and discharging times and different economic scenarios.
Requires utilities to evaluate investments in energy-storage resources as part of their integrated resource planning.
Requires utilities to develop long-term plans for integrating new energy-storage resources into existing generation and distribution assets to support grid transformation.
Requires long-term electric distribution-grid planning to assess grid-enhancing technologies and advanced conductors for reliability and cybersecurity and physical security. A utility that excludes those technologies must explain why.
Directs the State Corporation Commission to initiate, by March 1, 2027, an investigation of electric-load forecasting practices by Dominion Energy, Appalachian Power Company, and electric distribution cooperatives.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis statewide law affects large-load customers such as data centers connected to utilities serving Winchester City.Virginia HB 284 (2026)
What this means
Large data centers meeting the law’s energy-use thresholds would be covered, but the programs are voluntary and do not restrict building or operating a facility. They may encourage participants to shift or reduce electricity use, while possible incentives and reliability improvements could help; overall, the sources suggest no meaningful net effect.
People behind it
- Michael B. Feggans
Chief patron and bill introducer for HB284.
- Dominion Energy
Phase I utility directed to petition the State Corporation Commission for approval of a voluntary demand flexibility program.
- Appalachian Power
Phase I utility directed to petition the State Corporation Commission for approval of a voluntary demand flexibility program.
Show 2 more peopleShow fewer people
- Each cooperative that serves one or more high energy demand customers
Required to establish a voluntary demand flexibility program by January 1, 2029, and to convene technical work groups to develop program proposals.
- State Corporation Commission
Responsible for approving utility programs, determining standards and measurement requirements, reviewing cooperative work-group recommendations, and reporting program status and performance.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements5
High-energy-demand-customer requirements apply to retail electric customers with a contracted or measured demand of at least 25 megawatts and an anticipated or measured average annual load factor of at least 75 percent, excluding contracted defense facilities. Definition of “high energy demand customer”
Phase I and Phase II utilities must establish voluntary demand-flexibility programs for qualifying high-energy-demand customers. The programs must include Commission-approved annual demand-flexibility standards that utilities, working with those customers, must make best, reasonable efforts to meet or exceed. Utilities must petition for approval by January 15, 2027, and the Commission must issue final orders by November 30, 2027. file a petition with the Commission
A participating high-energy-demand customer may need to reduce or shift its own electricity use or secure measured and verified load reductions from other retail customers, including through capacity-reduction credits. Any participation incentives are contingent on verified reductions in peak demand or verified reductions secured from other customers. capacity reduction credits
Carbon-emitting generating resources cannot be used to participate in a demand-flexibility program or to meet its demand-flexibility standards. carbon-emitting generating resources will be ineligible
A cooperative serving one or more qualifying high-energy-demand customers must establish a voluntary demand-flexibility program by January 1, 2029. The program must include a Commission-approved demand-flexibility standard, and the cooperative must make best, reasonable efforts to meet it; the program must also prohibit customers from meeting the standard with carbon-emitting generation. By January 1, 2029
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions3
Data centers that qualify as high energy demand customers—generally those with at least 25 megawatts of contracted or measured demand and an average annual load factor of at least 75 percent—may participate in voluntary demand flexibility programs rather than being required to participate. The programs are intended to improve grid reliability and maximize system savings. The programs apply to high energy demand customers.
A qualifying data center may meet demand flexibility requirements without directly reducing its own electricity use by funding, supporting, or purchasing capacity reduction credits from other retail electric customers. Any reductions must be measurable and verifiable, and the Commission must establish the measurement and verification method. customers may be eligible to participate without directly curtailing their own electricity use.
If a demand flexibility program offers incentives, the Commission or cooperative may include procedures for accelerated interconnection for participating high energy demand customers. The acceleration cannot sacrifice electric-grid reliability, and the incentives are contingent on measured and verified demand or load reductions. incentives may also include open and transparent procedures for accelerated interconnection.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis statewide measure concerns more efficient use of electric-distribution capacity, including capacity needed by data centers.Virginia HB 434 (2026)
What this means
The measure directs utilities to assess grid use and report on ways to improve it, but it does not set rules for building or operating data centers. Any effect on data centers would be indirect through utility planning, so the overall impact is not meaningful based on these sources (grid utilization metrics).
People behind it
- Destiny LeVere Bolling
Chief patron who introduced HB 434
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
The State Corporation Commission must analyze whether each covered utility could improve grid utilization through non-wires alternatives, including power-quality monitoring equipment at the point of interconnection for customers with measured or contracted demand of 25 megawatts or greater. This can apply to very large data centers, but the act requires analysis rather than installation.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis Senate companion measure governs utility infrastructure and cost allocation for high-energy-use customers, including data centers.Virginia SB 377 (2026)
What this means
The measure could make expansion easier for large data centers by allowing an electric cooperative to agree to build a dedicated substation for a qualifying member with at least 20 MW of demand and a 230-kilovolt connection (eligibility requirements). The benefit is limited: the data center must pay the substation’s costs, and the rule applies only to qualifying cooperative customers.
People behind it
- Scott Surovell
Democratic
Primary sponsor and chief patron; introduced the measure.
- Lamont Bagby
Democratic
Cosponsor of the measure.
- Christie New Craig
RepublicanCosponsor of the measure.
Show 2 more peopleShow fewer people
- Todd Pillion
RepublicanCosponsor of the measure.
- State Corporation Commission
Administers provisions of the measure, including reviewing agreements, resolving disputes, and enforcing requirements.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements7
Only a member receiving regulated electric service with demand of at least 20 megawatts during the most recent calendar year, and requiring interconnection with a transmission system of 230 kilovolts or more, may use this substation-agreement process.
The member and electric cooperative must jointly file the substation-construction agreement with the State Corporation Commission for informational purposes; confidentiality is available only if the Commission is asked to provide it.
The substation must provide dedicated service only to the member’s facilities, be constructed at the member’s sole expense, and comply with applicable laws, regulations, reliability standards, and the cooperative’s specifications.
After the member gives written notice of substantial completion, the cooperative has up to 60 days to inspect the substation and up to 30 additional days after inspection to issue final construction change orders.
When construction is complete, the member must transfer ownership and control of the substation to the cooperative by donation or mutually agreed consideration, after which the cooperative will operate and maintain it at the member’s sole expense under the cooperative’s rates, terms, and conditions.
The Commission must exclude the substation’s acquisition, operation, and maintenance costs from the cooperative’s general and base rates, preventing those costs from being recovered from any ratepayer other than the member.
If the cooperative does not negotiate or propose a draft agreement within 120 days after the member’s written request, the member must petition the Commission to compel negotiations and pay fees established for adjudicating the petition; the Commission may take up to three months to hear it and up to six months to issue an order.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions8
Allows an electric cooperative to enter into an agreement with a qualifying member to construct a dedicated substation, supporting large facilities that used at least 20 megawatts of electricity during the most recent calendar year and require an interconnection with a transmission system of 230 kilovolts or more. The member must pay the construction costs.
Requires the cooperative to accept ownership and control of the completed substation by donation or mutually agreed consideration, allowing the member's facility to use cooperative-owned substation infrastructure after construction.
Requires the cooperative to operate and maintain the transferred substation for the member under the cooperative's applicable rates, terms, and conditions, with the member remaining responsible for those expenses.
Protects the member from subsidizing other customers by excluding the substation's acquisition, operation, and maintenance costs from the cooperative's general and base rates and requiring that those costs not be recovered from any ratepayer other than the participating member.
Exempts agreements and acquisitions conducted under the new section from provisions of Chapter 5 and Chapter 10.1 of Title 56, reducing the statutory requirements that would otherwise apply to those transactions.
Requires the cooperative and member to negotiate the substation agreement in good faith and lets the member petition the State Corporation Commission to order negotiations and a draft agreement if the cooperative does not negotiate or propose a draft within 120 days of a written request.
Requires the Commission, when a petition is filed, to hear it if necessary within three months and issue an order within six months, providing a time-limited process for resolving a cooperative's failure to negotiate.
Allows the jointly filed substation agreement to be treated confidentially by the Commission if requested, protecting sensitive project information.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis Senate companion measure seeks to optimize electric-grid utilization, which can affect data-center interconnection and service in Winchester City.Virginia SB 621 (2026)
What this means
This measure does not directly regulate data center construction or operation, but it could modestly help projects connect by requiring major utilities to assess how to use existing grid capacity better and consider alternatives to grid expansion (grid-use metrics and non-wires alternatives). It creates reporting and review duties for utilities, not new requirements for data centers, so the likely benefit is indirect.
People behind it
- Kannan Srinivasan
Democratic
Chief patron and introducer of SB621.
- Destiny LeVere Bolling
Democratic
Sponsor of HB434, the identical House measure.
- State Corporation Commission
Administers the measure by approving electric grid utilization metrics and reporting its findings.
Show 2 more peopleShow fewer people
- Dominion Energy
Utility required to petition for approval of grid utilization metrics and submit related system-performance assessments.
- Appalachian Power
Utility required to petition for approval of grid utilization metrics and submit related system-performance assessments.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions7
Requires Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power, as Phase I or Phase II utilities, to petition the State Corporation Commission by October 15, 2026, for electric-grid utilization metrics and to assess current distribution and transmission performance against optimal use of existing grid assets.
Requires proposed metrics to measure distribution-capacity utilization, delivered load versus potential deliverable load, distribution losses, constrained circuits, and system performance during peaks—information that can identify available capacity for additional large loads.
Directs the Commission to determine how approved metrics will apply at feeder and substation levels and how they will be reported in future integrated resource plans, including seasonal assessments where appropriate.
Requires the Commission, when approving metrics, to establish timelines for each covered utility to increase grid utilization and explain how the metrics may inform approval of future utility capital-investment cost recovery.
Requires the Commission’s annual report to analyze whether each covered utility can increase grid utilization through non-wires alternatives, including energy storage, customer-owned or customer-financed capacity, utility-owned or contracted distributed generation, virtual power plants, flexible transmission equipment, synchronous condensers, and other listed resources.
Requires analysis of power-quality monitoring equipment at the interconnection point for customers with measured or contracted demand of 25 megawatts or greater, directly covering qualifying large-load customers such as major data centers.
Allows the Commission to request information from each covered utility needed to evaluate non-wires alternatives and other methods of improving grid utilization, supporting review of infrastructure options for large-load interconnections.
Sources
current law · StatewideThis Senate companion measure addresses demand flexibility for large electricity customers, including data centers.Virginia SB 371 (2026)
What this means
The measure creates a small potential operating burden: utilities must set up flexibility programs, and covered customers are expected to make best, reasonable efforts to meet demand standards. It does not directly restrict data center construction, and participation is voluntary, with possible incentives such as faster interconnection.
People behind it
- Jeremy S. McPike
Chief patron who introduced SB371.
- State Corporation Commission
Administers the measure by reviewing and approving utility demand flexibility programs, soliciting comments on cooperative program reports, and reporting program status and performance.
- Dominion Energy
Phase I utility required to file and administer a voluntary demand flexibility program for qualifying high energy demand customers.
Show 2 more peopleShow fewer people
- Appalachian Power
Phase II utility required to file and administer a voluntary demand flexibility program for qualifying high energy demand customers.
- Cooperatives serving one or more high energy demand customers
Required to develop and establish voluntary demand flexibility programs for qualifying high energy demand customers.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements4
High energy demand customers—retail customers with contracted or measured demand of at least 25 megawatts and an average annual load factor of at least 75 percent—must work with their utility under a voluntary demand flexibility program and make best, reasonable efforts to meet or exceed an annual demand flexibility standard. The programs apply to Phase I and Phase II utilities, with utility petitions due by January 15, 2027, and Commission decisions due by November 30, 2027. The definition of “high energy demand customer” and the annual standard requirement
A high energy demand customer may not use carbon-emitting generating resources to satisfy demand flexibility requirements. Carbon-emitting generating resources will be ineligible
Participation incentives are contingent on measuring and verifying the customer's peak-demand reductions or load reductions obtained from other retail customers, creating measurement and verification requirements for customers seeking those incentives. Any such incentives shall be contingent upon the measurement and verification
Each cooperative serving at least one high energy demand customer must establish a voluntary demand flexibility program by January 1, 2029, and participating high energy demand customers must make best, reasonable efforts to meet the cooperative's Commission-approved demand flexibility standard. By January 1, 2029 and make best, reasonable efforts to meet
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions5
Phase I and Phase II utilities must establish voluntary demand-flexibility programs for qualifying high energy demand customers—customers with at least 25 MW of contracted or measured demand and an average annual load factor of at least 75 percent, subject to other statutory exclusions. The programs are intended to improve grid reliability and maximize system savings without making participation mandatory. (voluntary demand flexibility program)
A qualifying high energy demand customer may satisfy demand-flexibility requirements without directly reducing its own electricity use by funding, supporting, or purchasing verified capacity-reduction credits from other retail customers. (without directly curtailing their own electricity use)
Approved programs may include open and transparent incentives for accelerated interconnection to electric service for participating high energy demand customers, provided the accelerated connection does not compromise electric-grid reliability. (accelerated interconnection to service)
Utilities must consider multiple ways for high energy demand customers to manage or offset grid demand, including geographic or time shifting, dynamic voltage and frequency scaling, energy storage, and verified reductions obtained through other customers or third-party providers. (all forms of demand flexibility)
Cooperatives serving one or more qualifying high energy demand customers must establish voluntary demand-flexibility programs by January 1, 2029, and may allow customers to participate through purchased capacity-reduction credits rather than directly curtailing their own use. (each cooperative that serves one or more high energy demand customers shall establish)
Sources
current law · StatewideThis law creates a separate class of tangible personal property for computer equipment and peripherals used in data centers and defines what constitutes a data center for that tax classification.Virginia H.B. 1699 (2013) — Chapter 271; sponsors: not identified in the supplied text
What this means
The measure lets local governments classify data-center computer equipment separately, which can allow a lower personal-property tax and reduce costs of operating or expanding a facility. The tax reduction is optional, though, so the benefit depends on each locality’s decision.
People behind it
- Barbara J. Comstock
Introduced HB 1699.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Creates a separate local tangible personal property tax classification for computer equipment and peripherals used in a qualifying data center, allowing a county, city, or town to impose a lower tax rate than the general personal-property rate. The lower rate is optional for the locality, and the facility must primarily store, manage, or process digital data and meet the statutory definition of a data center. Computer equipment and peripherals used in a data center are classified separately, while the permitted rate may not exceed the general tangible-personal-property rate. The governing body may levy a tax at different rates
Sources
future law · StatewideBeginning January 1, 2027, Virginia S.B. 553, enacted as Chapter 896, requires certain water users to report additional consumption data if they must register withdrawal and use data with the State Water Control Board and supply water offsite.Virginia S.B. 553 (2026) — Chapter 896; Va. Code § 62.1-44.38
What this means
This would add a modest reporting burden: water providers already required to report would separately track water supplied to qualifying data centers, but the measure does not limit water use or require data centers themselves to file reports (separate water-volume reporting). The likely effect on building, expanding, or operating data centers is minor and indirect.
People behind it
- Kannan Srinivasan
Chief patron and introducer of SB553
- Marsden
Identified patron and co-sponsor of SB553
- Perry
Identified patron and co-sponsor of SB553
Show 4 more peopleShow fewer people
- Stuart
Identified patron and co-sponsor of SB553
- Williams Graves
Identified patron and co-sponsor of SB553
- State Water Control Board
Administers the water-user registration and reporting requirements under the measure
- Department of Environmental Quality
Administers responsibilities assigned by the measure, including regional water-planning assistance and air-permit identification of covered data centers
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Effective January 1, 2027, a water user already required to register withdrawal data that provides water offsite must separately report the monthly potable and reclaimed-water volumes supplied to a data center with a Department of Environmental Quality air permit. If monthly data is unavailable, quarterly reporting is allowed. This adds reporting and compliance requirements for water suppliers serving qualifying data centers; it does not impose a construction ban or direct operating limit on data centers. (reporting requirements for water supplied to data centers)
Sources
future law · StatewideVirginia HB 496, Chapter 623 approved April 13, 2026, adds water reporting requirements effective January 1, 2027.Virginia HB 496 (2026)
What this means
Minor indirect reporting burden for covered water suppliers, including separate potable and reclaimed water supplied to a data center with a DEQ air permit; no direct new data-center permit or operating limit.
People behind it
- Elizabeth R. Guzman
Chief patron of HB496, which enacted the measure.
- Senate Committee on Local Government
Proposed the Senate substitute for HB496.
- Department of Environmental Quality
Administers the regulatory action implementing the amendments.
Show 1 more peopleShow fewer people
- State Water Control Board
The Board to which covered water users report and that may require withdrawal and use data registration.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Covered offsite water suppliers must report separate monthly potable and reclaimed-water volumes for a data center with a DEQ air permit; quarterly reporting is permitted where monthly data is not available. The act is effective January 1, 2027.
Sources
pending · StatewideWould temporarily halt new data-center siting approvals if enacted.Virginia H1515 (2026)
What this means
The bill would temporarily stop localities from giving final approval to applications for siting new data centers until pending data-center utility connection requests are fulfilled or July 1, 2028, whichever comes first (temporary approval pause). That could substantially delay new construction; it does not directly restrict operating data centers.
Timing
- Ends
- the earlier of (i) fulfillment of all pending requests for interconnection to distribution service by an electric utility customer that is a data center or (ii) 2028-07-01
The moratorium applies to final local approval of rezoning, special exception, special use permit, site plan, or plan of development for a new data center.
People behind it
- Irene Shin
Democratic
Patron who introduced the bill
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Creates a temporary moratorium on localities granting final approval for a rezoning, special exception, special use permit, site plan, or plan of development for siting a new data center. The moratorium lasts until the earlier of fulfillment of all pending requests for distribution-service interconnection from electric-utility customers that are data centers or July 1, 2028.
Sources
failed · StatewideThis proposed bill would have required notice to residents within one-half mile, two neighborhood meetings, baseline acoustic studies, sound mitigation, and recurring third-party noise studies for data-center land-use applications.Virginia S1046 (2025)
What this means
The proposal would add neighborhood notice and meetings, sound studies, and follow-up reporting for large power-using campuses, creating some extra cost and delay (one neighborhood meeting). But it ties sound mitigation to the local noise ordinance and offers an affirmative defense when operators meet its requirements, so the added burden appears limited (applicable noise ordinance).
People behind it
- Danica A. Roem
Democratic
Chief patron and sponsor of SB 1046.
- Senate Committee on Local Government
Proposed the amendment in the nature of a substitute for SB 1046.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements17
The introduced bill conditions approval of any local land-use application required to site a data center on compliance with the bill’s notice and noise-abatement requirements.
The introduced bill requires mailed notice to residents and property owners’ associations within a half-mile radius of the proposed data-center parcel.
The introduced bill requires the operator to hold two neighborhood meetings, provide notice of them, have a decision-making representative attend, and post an approved sign on the property at least 15 days before each meeting.
Before the first neighborhood meeting, the introduced bill requires the property owner to obtain a baseline sound study from a third-party acoustic engineer, measure noise at the nearest residential or other noise-sensitive property line, and provide the study to the locality.
The introduced bill requires a data center to be designed and built with sound mitigation sufficient to keep emitted sound from exceeding ambient levels documented in the baseline study, with design specifications submitted before building-permit approval.
After issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the introduced bill requires a peak-operation noise study and additional annual studies for five years, with results provided to the locality within 30 days of each certificate-of-occupancy anniversary.
If backup generators are used, the introduced bill requires a public website announcing generator operation, at least 24 hours’ advance notice of routine operation and tests, and 24 hours’ advance notice to the locality of tests.
Except when supplying backup power during an outage, the introduced bill limits backup-generator operation to 9:00 a.m. through 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays.
The introduced bill requires any local noise ordinance to establish maximum sound levels for data centers, use alternative low-frequency noise metrics, and include separate zoning-based noise rules and enforcement mechanisms.
The committee substitute applies the requirements to a high electrical demand campus rather than every data center, defining it as a facility with a dedicated substation connected to a transmission line of at least 69 kilovolts that is reasonably anticipated to require more than 100 megawatts from a retail electric utility.
Under the committee substitute, required notice is limited to residents and property owners’ associations within one-quarter mile of the parcel.
Under the committee substitute, the operator must hold at least one neighborhood meeting, provide notice of it, have a technically knowledgeable developer representative attend, and post an approved sign at least 15 days before the meeting.
Under the committee substitute, the pre-meeting sound study must be conducted by a third-party certified acoustic engineer and measure baseline sound at the nearest feasibly accessible residential property line.
Under the committee substitute, sound mitigation must ensure compliance with the applicable adopted noise ordinance, and mitigation design specifications must be submitted before building-permit approval.
Under the committee substitute, the operator must conduct an initial post-occupancy noise study and annual peak-operation studies for three years, submitting results within 60 days of the anniversary of the initial post-construction study.
The committee substitute allows an operator to request an extension of sound-study submission deadlines if justified by externalities or factors beyond the operator’s reasonable control.
The committee substitute provides an affirmative defense in later noise-ordinance litigation only if the operator demonstrates compliance with the applicable noise ordinance and consistency of the facility’s design and mitigation methods with prior studies and submissions.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions4
The substitute limits the section’s coverage to a “high electrical demand campus”—a facility with a dedicated substation connected to a transmission line of at least 69 kilovolts that is reasonably expected to require more than 100 megawatts—so facilities below those thresholds would not be subject to these requirements.
The substitute requires sound mitigation to ensure that the facility complies with the applicable adopted noise ordinance, rather than requiring sound levels to remain below the preconstruction ambient baseline, allowing development to proceed under the locality’s established noise limits.
The substitute allows an operator to request an extension of deadlines for submitting sound studies when external circumstances or factors outside the operator’s reasonable control affect its ability to complete the studies.
The substitute provides an affirmative defense in later legal actions alleging a noise-ordinance violation if the operator can show that facility noise complies with the applicable ordinance and that its design and mitigation methods are consistent with prior studies and submissions.
Sources
failed · State measure: Localities where data centers are already addressed in the zoning ordinance and the locality is revising its zoning ordinance to include data centersThis proposed bill would have required localities that already address data centers in their zoning ordinances to review industrial-use classification, by-right locations, setbacks, building heights, optimal development areas, sound modeling, low-frequency noise, and mitigation commitments.Virginia H2026 (2025)
What this means
If enacted, the bill would require some localities to review data-center zoning and could add location, noise, and neighborhood-mitigation conditions, creating meaningful planning costs or delays (zoning review requirements). The impact is limited because the requirements apply only to localities that already address data centers in their zoning rules and are revising those rules.
People behind it
- Joshua Thomas
Democratic
Patron and sponsor of HB2026
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements5
A locality must review and, if necessary, amend its zoning ordinance by the date of its next comprehensive-plan update to comply with the bill. This applies only where data centers are already addressed in the zoning ordinance and the locality is revising the ordinance to include data centers. review and amend its zoning ordinance
Localities must review areas where data centers are allowed by right and adjust the zoning map if needed, taking proximity to residential areas into account. This could limit the locations where data centers may be built by right. adjust the zoning map
Localities must review zoning requirements such as setbacks and building heights to mitigate impacts on residential or other sensitive areas and consider adding data-center-specific requirements. These requirements could impose additional development constraints. setbacks and building heights
Localities must consider zoning changes to reduce the likelihood of noisy data centers, including limiting allowable locations and requiring sound modeling, and must prohibit constant low-frequency data-center noise from reaching residential areas. requiring sound modeling
Data centers making zoning requests must provide commitments sufficient to mitigate negative impacts on nearby residential areas, creating an additional condition for zoning approval. require commitments from data centers
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions2
Requires a locality, when reviewing its zoning ordinance, to designate data centers as industrial uses for zoning purposes. This applies only where data centers are already addressed in the ordinance and the locality is revising its ordinance to include data centers.
Requires a locality to identify optimal areas for data center development, including locations considered suitable from both the locality's and the data center industry's perspectives. The review must occur by the locality's next comprehensive-plan update, to the extent necessary.
Sources
failed · StatewideWould require local governments to approve data-center siting applications only when the facility is on property classified for industrial use under a local ordinance.Virginia S1045 (2025)
What this means
The bill would require covered data center siting applications submitted on or after July 1, 2025, to be for property classified for industrial use (the industrial-use requirement). This could limit site choices and add costs or delays, but it does not ban data centers or regulate the operation of existing facilities.
People behind it
- Roem
Patron of Senate Bill No. 1045
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements1
Beginning July 1, 2025, a local government may approve a land-use application required to site a data center only if the data center will be located on property classified for industrial use by local ordinance.
Sources
failed · StatewideWould have required localities to obtain site assessments before approving applications for new high energy use facilities requiring at least 100 megawatts, including analysis of sound impacts on nearby residences and schools within 500 feet and, at the locality’s discretion, effects on water, agricultural resources, parks, historic sites, and forestland.Virginia HB 1601 (2025)
What this means
The measure would require applicants for new facilities expected to use at least 100 megawatts to submit a sound assessment, and the utility to provide certain service details, before local approval (site-assessment requirements). These steps could add cost or delay, but the rule is limited to large new facilities and exempts certain expansions, so it is a meaningful but not severe barrier.
People behind it
- Joshua E. Thomas
Democratic
Chief patron who introduced HB1601.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements4
For a new high energy use facility expected to require 100 megawatts or more of electricity, a locality must require an applicant to submit a site assessment before approving a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit. The assessment must examine, when practicable, the facility’s sound profile at residential units and schools within 500 feet of the property boundary. The requirement does not apply to an expansion or modification of an already approved facility that adds no more than 100 megawatts. site assessment before approval
A locality may require the site assessment for a new high energy use facility to evaluate effects on ground and surface water, agricultural resources, parks, registered historic sites, and forestland on the site or immediately contiguous land. The assessment must be completed when practicable and within the statutory review timeline. locality may also require
Before approving a rezoning, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility, the locality must require the serving electric utility to submit, when known and practicable and within the statutory review timeline, a form identifying substations that will serve the facility and the anticipated transmission voltage. electric utility ... submit to the locality a form
The locality must use the submitted site assessments and utility information to evaluate consistency with its comprehensive plan and compliance with applicable noise ordinances, zoning provisions, laws, and regulations, creating an additional review requirement for covered facilities. shall be used by the locality
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
Existing or already approved facilities may expand or be modified without complying with the measure’s site-assessment requirements, provided the expansion does not exceed an additional 100 megawatts of electrical power.
Sources
failed · StatewideVirginia SB 1449 would have required localities reviewing new high-energy-use facilities expected to require at least 100 megawatts to obtain a site assessment before approving rezoning, special-exception, or special-use applications.Virginia SB 1449 (2025)
What this means
For new facilities expected to use at least 100 megawatts, the bill would add a sound assessment and utility information filing before local approval, creating some extra cost and paperwork. The requirements apply during siting review—not routine operation—and expansions below the stated 100-megawatt threshold are exempt; the bill was vetoed, but this score assesses it as if enacted. Required site assessment
People behind it
- Adam P. Ebbin
Democratic
Chief patron and introducer of SB1449; identified as the patron before the Senate substitute.
- Senate Committee on Local Government
Proposed the Senate committee substitute for the measure.
- Senator McPike
Served as a Senate conferee during the conference committee consideration of SB1449.
Show 4 more peopleShow fewer people
- Senator Hackworth
Served as a Senate conferee during the conference committee consideration of SB1449.
- Delegate Thomas
Served as a House conferee during the conference committee consideration of SB1449.
- Delegate Sewell
Served as a House conferee during the conference committee consideration of SB1449.
- Delegate Morefield
Served as a House conferee during the conference committee consideration of SB1449.
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements5
For a new high energy use facility requiring at least 100 megawatts of electrical power, a locality must require the applicant to perform and submit a site assessment before approving a rezoning application, special exception, or special use permit. The assessment must examine the facility’s sound profile on residential units and schools within 500 feet of the property boundary.
A locality may require the site assessment for a new high energy use facility to examine effects on ground and surface water, agricultural resources, parks, registered historic sites, and forestland on the site or immediately contiguous land.
Before approval of a rezoning application, special exception, or special use permit for a new high energy use facility, the serving electric utility must submit, to the extent known and practicable, information identifying substations that will serve the facility and the anticipated transmission voltage.
The required site assessments and utility information must be used by the locality to evaluate consistency with its comprehensive plan and compliance with its noise ordinances, zoning provisions, and other applicable laws and regulations.
The requirements do not apply to an expansion or modification of a facility with existing legislative or administrative approval when the expansion does not exceed an additional 100 megawatts of electrical power.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions4
Facilities that an applicant reasonably anticipates will require less than 100 megawatts of electrical power are not classified as high energy use facilities and therefore are not subject to the bill’s site-assessment requirements.
An already approved or existing facility may expand or be modified without being subject to the bill when the expansion does not exceed an additional 100 megawatts of electrical power.
Required site assessments must be completed, to the extent practicable, within the statutory timeline applicable to the locality’s review, limiting the time available for the assessment process.
The measure preserves existing local zoning authority, allowing localities to continue using their existing authority to approve, regulate, or otherwise make zoning decisions regarding data centers.
Sources
failed · StatewideThis proposed statewide bill would require facilities with electricity demand above 25 megawatts, including potentially data centers, to obtain a certificate of operation from the State Corporation Commission.Virginia HB 155 (2026)
What this means
The bill would require new facilities over 25 megawatts, including many data centers, to get a state certificate before operating, with review of grid, rate, environmental, and public-interest impacts (certificate required before operation). This approval process could cause significant delays or uncertainty, though it would not ban development outright.
People behind it
- Joshua E. Thomas
Democratic
Chief patron and introducer of HB155
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements6
New facilities, or facilities operating together as one facility at the State Corporation Commission’s discretion, are subject to the bill if their electricity demand or contracted capacity exceeds 25 megawatts and they were not operating before July 1, 2026.
No person may operate a covered high-load facility without first obtaining a certificate of operation from the State Corporation Commission, which may be issued only after applicable notice and hearing requirements are satisfied.
The Commission may issue the certificate only after finding that the facility and associated facilities will not materially adversely affect customer rates, electric-service reliability, or the incumbent utility’s compliance with energy and environmental requirements; are consistent with the Commonwealth Clean Energy Policy; and are not otherwise contrary to the public interest.
The Commission must evaluate environmental and public-health effects and may impose conditions to minimize adverse impacts, including considering notice to the incumbent utility, public and stakeholder information about energy use and impacts, available energy and grid infrastructure, cumulative impacts of multiple high-load facilities, economic-development benefits, and potential unreasonable cross-subsidies among utility customers.
The bill overrides conflicting legal requirements, including an electric utility’s obligation to provide service, so that the certificate-of-operation requirements control.
A facility may receive a limited presumption that it satisfies certain approval requirements by securing sufficient contracts with energy-storage or zero-carbon generation resources within the regional transmission entity’s service territory, or by adopting sufficient energy-efficiency, demand-response, load-shedding, or load-reassignment measures designed to offset its contribution to system peak demand.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions1
A high-load facility can receive a presumption that it will not adversely affect the utility’s legal compliance, is consistent with Virginia’s clean-energy policy, and is not contrary to the public interest if it secures sufficient contracts for energy storage or zero-carbon generation, or implements energy-efficiency, demand-response, load-shedding, or load-reassignment measures designed to offset its contribution to system peak demand. This presumption does not eliminate the certificate requirement or the separate findings required regarding customer rates and electric-service reliability. The operation of a high-load facility shall be presumed
Sources
failed · State measure: Localities where data centers are already addressed in the zoning ordinance or where the locality is revising its zoning ordinance to include data centersThis proposed bill would require localities, during their next comprehensive-plan update, to designate data centers as industrial uses and review their zoning locations, setbacks, building heights, sound modeling, low-frequency noise controls, and mitigation commitments.Virginia HB 511 (2026)
What this means
The bill would classify data centers as industrial uses and require localities to review where they can be built and consider rules for setbacks, height, noise, and reducing impacts. These steps could add meaningful costs or delays, but they do not ban data centers and apply only where local zoning covers them.
People behind it
- John C McAuliff
Chief patron who offered and introduced the bill
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements7
By the locality’s next comprehensive-plan update, data centers must be designated as industrial uses for zoning purposes.
Localities must review where data centers are allowed by right and adjust their zoning maps if needed, including consideration of proximity to residential areas.
Localities must review requirements such as setbacks and building heights and may add data-center-specific requirements to mitigate impacts on residential or other sensitive areas.
Localities must consider zoning changes that limit where data centers may be located and require sound modeling.
Localities must consider prohibiting constant low-frequency data-center noise from reaching residential areas.
Data centers seeking zoning approval must commit to sufficiently mitigating negative impacts on nearby residential areas.
These requirements apply only where data centers are already addressed in the locality’s zoning ordinance or where the locality is revising its ordinance to address data centers.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions2
When reviewing or updating their zoning ordinances, localities must designate data centers as industrial uses for zoning purposes, potentially allowing them to be developed in industrial zones. This applies by the locality’s next comprehensive-plan update and only where data centers are already addressed in the ordinance or the locality is revising it to include them.
Localities must identify optimal areas for data center development, including locations considered suitable by both the locality and the data center industry, to support site selection and future development.
Sources
repealed · StatewideImplements standards for the safe use of artificial intelligence across the Commonwealth of Virginia.Virginia Executive Order 30 (2024)
What this means
The order focuses on safe use of artificial intelligence across the Commonwealth, not data center construction, expansion, or operation. It therefore appears to have no meaningful direct effect on data centers.
People behind it
- Governor Glenn Youngkin
Issued Executive Order 30.
Sources
Data provided by Regbase · Cookie preferences · Report missing data
