Yakutat City and Borough
For Yakutat City and Borough, see Alaska’s statewide laws and regulations below. No additional county-specific measures are listed in our research.
Pro-Data Center Policies
Alaska allows municipalities to exempt or defer taxes on qualifying development property by ordinance, subject to eligibility rules and possible objections. State support can cover early data-center reviews, but not construction or project approval.
Incentives
Tax benefits
Establishes municipal authority to exempt economic-development property from taxation for up to five years and defer its taxes for up to five years. The attached bill proposes removing the school-district local-contribution restriction on exemptions.
current law · StatewideAllows municipalities to support economic development by ordinance through partial or complete property-tax exemptions or tax deferrals for qualifying economic development property for up to five years, with renewal permitted under stated conditions.Alaska Stat. § 29.45.050
What this means
The bill would let municipalities exempt or defer property taxes on qualifying economic-development property for a designated period, without the current five-year limit, potentially lowering data-center costs substantially. The benefit is not automatic: a municipality must adopt an ordinance, and qualifying property must meet the law’s criteria, including creating local jobs or supporting qualifying sales; an elected service-area board may also object in some cases.
People behind it
- House Rules Committee
Committee that offered the House CS for CS for Senate Bill No. 179
- Senator Bjorkman
Listed Senate sponsor of the bill
- Senator Gray-Jackson
Listed Senate sponsor of the bill
Show 4 more peopleShow fewer people
- Representative Coulombe
Listed House sponsor of the bill
- Representative Vance
Listed House sponsor of the bill
- Representative Saddler
Listed House sponsor of the bill
- Representative Josephson
Listed House sponsor of the bill
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements2
A municipality may apply an economic-development-property tax exemption or deferral to taxes for special services in an elected service area only if the service-area board does not object by resolution within 60 days after the municipal ordinance takes effect. An objection can prevent the exemption or deferral from applying to those taxes.
Economic-development-property tax exemptions or deferrals require a municipal ordinance with specific eligibility requirements and a written application for each exemption or deferral. Proposed ordinances must also include written notice that voters may repeal them through referendum, creating procedural uncertainty for projects relying on the tax benefit.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions3
A municipality may partially or totally exempt qualifying economic development property from property taxation for a designated period, rather than the current maximum of five years. The exemption requires an ordinance with specific eligibility requirements and a written application. The property must generally be new to the municipality, used in a business that creates local employment, generates sales outside the municipality, or reduces imports, and not have been used in the same business elsewhere for at least six months.
A municipality may defer payment of property taxes on qualifying economic development property for a designated period, rather than the current maximum of five years. The deferral requires an ordinance with specific eligibility requirements and a written application, and the property must meet the economic-development eligibility criteria.
An economic-development property tax exemption or deferral may cover taxes levied for special services in an elected service-area district, unless the elected service-area board objects by resolution within 60 days after the municipal ordinance takes effect.
Sources
current law · StatewideApproved unanimously on July 8, 2026, the resolution establishes and maintains a due-diligence fund of up to $4.5 million for evaluating potential AIDEA projects and economic-development opportunities.AIDEA Resolution G26-08
What this means
The measure could modestly help data-center projects by paying for early reviews, and it specifically includes data centers. But it does not fund construction or approve projects; it only supports preliminary work, so the practical benefit is limited (“does not approve any individual project”).
People behind it
- Randy Ruaro
AIDEA Executive Director who presented the resolution and whose staff recommended its approval; authorized to administer the due diligence fund under the resolution.
- Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority
Authority responsible for establishing, maintaining, and administering the due diligence fund.
- Albert Fogle
AIDEA Board Vice-Chair who moved to approve Resolution G26-08 and seconded the amendment.
Show 2 more peopleShow fewer people
- Al Haynes
AIDEA Board member who seconded the motion to approve Resolution G26-08.
- Randy Eledge
AIDEA Board member who proposed and moved the amendment to Section 6 of Resolution G26-08.
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions7
Creates a due diligence fund of up to $4.5 million for initial planning, feasibility reviews, financial analysis, legal and technical reviews, engineering, environmental and permitting assessments, market analysis, site analysis, valuation, risk assessment, and transaction structuring for potential projects, including data centers and technology infrastructure. (up to $4,500,000)
Allows AIDEA to use the fund for potential data centers and other technology infrastructure projects that may promote economic growth, employment, investment, and diversification in Alaska. (technology infrastructure, data centers)
Authorizes AIDEA to retain financial, legal, engineering, technical, environmental, permitting, market, valuation, and other professional advisers to evaluate qualifying projects, subject to staff recommendation and Executive Director selection. (engage consultants, financial advisors, attorneys)
Allows AIDEA to enter pre-development, cost-sharing, reimbursement, confidentiality, access, and memorandum-of-understanding agreements with project sponsors, developers, private companies, public entities, tribes, nonprofits, investors, and other parties. (pre-development agreements, cost-sharing agreements)
Permits fund expenditures before a data center or other project receives formal development-finance consideration, Board approval, financing, ownership, operation, or another transaction approval, allowing early-stage work to proceed before final project authorization. (before the Authority determines)
Allows the Executive Director, after fiscal year 2027 and unless the Board directs otherwise, to refresh the fund to a target balance of $4.5 million from the Revolving Fund, Sustainable Energy and Transmission Fund, Arctic Infrastructure Development Fund, or other legally available Authority funds. The refresh is subject to legally permissible funding, accounting, budgeting, and financial controls. (Following fiscal year 2027)
Does not require early-stage due diligence costs to be reimbursed by a project sponsor, developer, borrower, private partner, or other party before AIDEA may spend from the fund; AIDEA may seek reimbursement when appropriate. (reimbursement shall not be required)
Sources
failed · StatewideWould require qualifying Alaska data centers to obtain utility service contracts approved by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska, assign data-center-related infrastructure and variable costs to the data center, and adopt backup-power safeguards, with financial security required for certain utility investments.Alaska SB 250 (2026)
What this means
The bill would add meaningful costs and steps for large data centers: utilities must get contracts approved, assign project costs to the center, and require financial security when utility investment exceeds $1 million (financial security requirement). Municipal agreements and end-of-life plans add more obligations, though smaller centers below both stated usage thresholds are exempt (small-center exemption). These safeguards may protect customers and communities, but they do not outweigh the practical burden on development and operation.
People behind it
- Senator Löki Gale Tobin
Primary sponsor of Senate Bill 250
Restrictions & requirementsHide restrictions & requirements11
Covered data centers must obtain a utility service contract that is submitted to and approved by the Regulatory Commission of Alaska before service can be provided. The contract may not increase the risk of inadequate fuel supplies for any public utility in the state. (the commission must review and approve the contract)
The data center must bear all utility infrastructure costs incurred primarily to serve it, including its allocated share of infrastructure jointly used with other customers. Customer payment may be required through construction, contributions toward construction, or rates that include those costs. (directly assign those costs to the customer)
Transmission infrastructure built specifically to serve a data center cannot initially be treated as part of the backbone transmission system for allocating backbone-system costs; it may be considered for that designation only after review at the end of the contract term if other customers also use it. (may not initially be considered part of a backbone transmission system)
All variable utility costs that change because of service to the data center must be analyzed and assigned directly to the data center through a separate customer-specific power or gas cost adjustment. The arrangement may not increase those adjustments for other customers. (assign those costs directly to the data center)
The utility contract must include a backup-power and reliability plan that prioritizes renewable generation, storage, and demand response; limits fossil-fuel backup to emergencies and testing; requires annual reporting of diesel or other fossil-fuel backup use; and prohibits shifting fuel or reliability risks to other customers. (limits fossil fuel backup generation to emergencies and testing)
If serving the data center requires more than $1 million in utility capital investment, the data center must provide financial security sufficient to cover all utility costs if it fails to perform under the contract. (capital investment costs in excess of $1,000,000)
Before the commission may approve the utility contract and before construction begins, the data center must enter into a community benefit agreement with the municipality. If it does not, the municipality may sue for an injunction stopping construction or preventing operation. (before the commission approves the contract)
The community benefit agreement must require a waste-heat recovery assessment, implementation of practicable recovery or an agreed payment for local thermal projects, a water-use and wastewater plan, payment or arrangements for broadband interconnection costs, and a digital-equity contribution for local digital infrastructure. (require a digital equity contribution)
Before the commission may approve the utility contract, the data center must file an end-of-life decommissioning and recycling plan with the Department of Environmental Conservation. The plan must cover dismantling, equipment removal, secure data destruction, asset recovery, site restoration, and regulatory and environmental compliance. (must file with the Department of Environmental Conservation)
The commission may treat geographically dispersed buildings and equipment under common ownership or control as one facility, which can prevent separate sites from being treated as below-threshold facilities. (the commission may determine that the infrastructure is a single facility)
The contract, community-agreement, and decommissioning requirements do not apply to a data center consuming less than 15 megawatts of peak electric demand and less than 1.5 billion standard cubic feet of gas annually; facilities meeting or exceeding either threshold are not covered by this exception. (does not apply to a data center that consumes less than)
Benefits & exceptionsHide benefits & exceptions5
Utilities must enter into service contracts with data centers and submit them to the Regulatory Commission of Alaska for approval. Once approved, the contract’s terms govern the utility’s services and facilities for the data center, providing a defined framework for obtaining and continuing utility service.
A data center’s infrastructure costs may be recovered through several arrangements, including the data center constructing the infrastructure itself, making contributions toward construction, or paying utility rates that include the costs. This gives data centers and utilities flexibility to finance and build necessary facilities.
Transmission infrastructure built specifically to serve a data center may not initially be treated as part of the backbone transmission system for allocating backbone-system costs. It may be considered for that status only after the contract ends and a review finds that other customers also use it.
Approved contracts must include a backup-power and reliability plan that allows renewable generation, storage, demand response, and limited diesel or other fossil-fuel backup use for emergencies and testing. This provides a legally recognized way for data centers to maintain operations during reliability events, subject to reporting and limits.
The measure does not apply to a data center consuming less than 15 megawatts of peak electric demand and less than 1.5 billion standard cubic feet of gas annually. Facilities below both thresholds are therefore exempt from the measure’s special contract, community-benefit, and decommissioning-plan requirements.
Sources
Data provided by Regbase · Cookie preferences · Report missing data
